Do you have a search site? Submit it free to the internet's best search industry directory. » Click Here Search Engines Google, Yahoo, MSN... Search Marketing Marketing, Budget, Planning... Pay Per Click Bid, Price, Quality... SEO Companies Optimization, Manage, Company... SEO Tools Track, Search, Create... Analytics Statistics, Counter... » Submit your site for FREE « More... Get Your Site Submitted for Free in the World's Largest B2B Directory! Email Address: * URL: * *Indicates Mandatory Field Terms & Conditions Titan Quest Forum Nintendo Wii Graphics Forum Halo 3 Forum Mac Software

Should You Rely On Alexa

Most webmasters will probably snicker about that statement, since supplemental docs were famous for refreshing less often and showing up in search results less often. But the supplemental index served an important purpose: it stored unusual documents that we would search in more depth for harder or more esoteric queries. For a long time, the alternative was to simply not show those documents at all, but this was always unsatisfying"ideally, we would search all of the documents all of the time, to give users the experience they expect.

So some questions:

So we should consider the SI as gone or non-existent correct?

Should we even look at those inaccurate SI or pages indexed operators ever again?

Are all pages being judged equally right now?

Is this why many websites have been seeing the total number of pages indexed going down when checking the site: operator?

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Furl