Visit the SearchNewz Directory
Do you have a search site?
Submit it free to the internet's best search industry directory. » Click Here
Search Engines
Google, Yahoo, MSN...

Search Marketing
Marketing, Budget, Planning...

Pay Per Click
Bid, Price, Quality...
SEO Companies
Optimization, Manage, Company...

SEO Tools
Track, Search, Create...

Analytics
Statistics, Counter...
» Submit your site for FREE «

Latest News

Get Your Site Submitted for Free in the World's Largest B2B Directory!

Email Address:
* URL:
*
*Indicates Mandatory Field

Terms & Conditions



Titan Quest Forum Nintendo Wii Graphics Forum
Halo 3 Forum Mac Software

Ban On Trademarked Terms

By: Geoff Simon
2007-04-05

People have been suing Google for years over competitors bidding on their trademarked terms, but not until now has one maverick state decided to do something about it.

SEO And PPC Should Be Friends
SEO And PPC Should Be Friends

Say hello to the 45th state in our union, the great state of Utah? Huh? Not to worry though, the Trademark Protection Act will probably be deemed unconstitutional due to the burden it places on interstate commerce.

Think about all the undue stress this would place on advertisers and suppliers? They would have to make sure all their ads bypass display on a computer in Utah, which in itself is not simple or even really possible. Being a Google AdWords Expert and knowing all the targeting options Google provides, there is still no way to really tell where your ads will be displayed in Google, not to mention their search partners and content network.

In case you are still interested, you can pay around $250 each year for what Utah is calling an electronic registration mark. This will allow you protection for your trademarked term so it is not used by competitors to trigger ads (you can read the specifics here). Take my word for it though, save the money. Even Utahs General Counsel stated the act would probably be found unconstitutional.

The fundamental purpose of trademarks is to give consumers accurate information about goods and services. Trademarks mark the origin of the product and companies have been using this shorthand to give consumers information about comparative goods and services. Why do you think its okay for Pepsi to tell people that people prefer the taste of Pepsi over Coke? Or why Apple is bashing Microsoft on TV all the time? This is about marketers offering comparative advertising based on trademarks that are clearly meant to inform and empower consumers. If you ask me, I feel bad for Utah taxpayers who have to foot the bill for this ridiculousness. Isnt there anything else going on out there in the Utah Legislature?

Comments

Tag: , ,

Add to Del.icio.us | Digg | Reddit | Furl

Have a bookmark! -





About the Author:
Geoff Simon is President and co-author of the Sky Search Placement Blog. He has over 10 years of experience with search, database and direct marketing as well as significant public relations experience.
Privacy Policy Legal Sitemap Contact Us RSS Feeds Newsletter Archive SearchNewz.com Privacy Policy Legal Sitemap Contact Us RSS Feeds Newsletter Signup Subscribe to our feeds!