![]() |
|
Big Brand Bailout - Google
By: Todd Malicoat 2009-03-02 Recent logic suggests if banks arent good at managing money, but theyre big, we should give them more money. If a car company, doesnt... ...make very good cars (but theyre big), they should get more money. It looks like Google is following suit on the big brand bailout, by offering up better results to those bigger brands. Now weve always known that big brands get treated a bit differently, and can embrace a bit more aggressive strategy, but now they get a branding bump bailout? Hardly seems fair. It seems like adwords wasnt enough though - that big brands are now able to rank easily for their generic terms. Big brands seem to suck at search engine optimization. I guess it follows the current American way that we should give them more search traffic. ![]() More on the Big Brand Bump Bailout:
I think the most important questions were asked by Michael Gray (of Wolf-Howl SEO) and Marty Weintraub (Aimclear Marketing) - What are the signals associated with determining brand dominance over a generic keyword? (IE - How can *I* get a big brand bump bailout too?:) CommentsTag: Google, Bailout, SEO Add to Del.icio.us | Digg | Reddit | Furl Have a bookmark! -
About the Author: Todd Malicoat aka Stuntdubl made his first horrible looking website full of animated .gifs in 1997, and after fours years of failure and experimentation ended up in the world of SEO and internet marketing in early 2001. He is currently an independent marketing consultant from the SEO school of thought. Todd earned a bachelors of business adminstration from Northwood University in 2003 while running an web design and consulting firm Meta4creations, LLC. Todd is a speaker at both Webmasterworld and Search Engine Strategies conferences. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SearchNewz
is an iEntry, Inc. ® publication
©
$line) {
echo $line ;
}
?>
All Rights Reserved. Newsletter Archive - Privacy Policy - Legal - Sitemap - Contact Us - RSS Feeds - Newsletter Signup |