iEntry 10th Anniversary RSS Contact


Verizon And Microsoft Mobile Search Deal

By: Jordan McCollum
2009-01-08

Its been a year of rumors and intrigue for Verizon. Okay, maybe its not quite that dramatic, but there has been a little sturm-und-drang surrounding...

...the soon-to-be-largest-in-the-US mobile carriers next mobile search deal. MSFT CEO Steve Ballmer is going to be announcing this tonight during his CES keynote, according to Verizon CEO Ivan Seidenberg"Verizon has chosen Microsoft to provide its mobile search.

Over the last few months, there have been rumors that Google or Microsoft would be the pick, but not so much for Yahoo. As one analyst told Reuters:

Its certainly a feather in Microsofts cap. Tough news for Google and tougher news for Yahoo, CCS Insight analyst John Jackson said of the agreement.

Verizon will pass AT&T to become the largest mobile network this week when their acquisition of Alltel closes. However the soon-to-be-number-one network decided not to go with either of the two most popular search engines in its mobile partnership.

In November, when the rumors about a deal with Microsoft surfaced, the reports indicated that the deal would involve revenue sharing for the two companies, with Verizon receiving a minimum payment:

Verizon would also be guaranteed payments of about $550 million to $650 million over five years"about twice what rival Google offered. In addition, Verizon could agree to use Microsofts mobile operating system in more of its phones, generating additional payments.

At the time, it also seemed likely that Google would make a higher and/or different bid to try to block the deal with Microsoft, as they apparently did with MSFTs offer for Yahoo almost a year ago. (Please dont tell me youve forgotten.)

However, Google proved to be ultimately unwilling to follow through with the legal hassles their Yahoo deal created and that deal failed in the end, as well. Maybe they did make a counter offer, or maybe they just wouldnt raise their price, hoping that the superior relevance (or perceived relevance) of their results would be enough to swing a deal in their favor without the extra cash.

What do you think"is the deal better for Microsoft because theyre getting the deal, or because Google isnt? Or perhaps none of the above?

Comments

Tag: , ,


Add to Del.icio.us | Digg | Reddit | Furl

Have a bookmark! -


About the Author:
Jordan McCollum is a staff writer for the popular marketing blog Marketing Pilgrim. She has worked in search engine optimization with clients including 3M, Little Giant Ladders and ADP. After graduating from Brigham Young University, Jordan joined the SEO copywriting team at the Internet marketing firm 10x Marketing. After 10x closed its doors in December 2006, Jordan became a freelance writer and Internet marketing consultant specializing in SEO. She also has extensive experience with web analytics, conversion rate enhancement and e-mail marketing.


Visit the SearchNewz Directory
Do you have a search site?
Submit it free to the internet's best search industry directory. » Click Here
Search Engines
Google, Yahoo, MSN...

Search Marketing
Marketing, Budget, Planning...

Pay Per Click
Bid, Price, Quality...
SEO Companies
Optimization, Manage, Company...

SEO Tools
Track, Search, Create...

Analytics
Statistics, Counter...
» Submit your site for FREE «

Latest News

Get Your Site Submitted for Free in the World's Largest B2B Directory!

Email Address:
* URL:
*
*Indicates Mandatory Field

Terms & Conditions



Titan Quest Forum Nintendo Wii Graphics Forum
Halo 3 Forum Mac Software

Privacy Policy Legal Sitemap Contact Us RSS Feeds Newsletter Archive SearchNewz.com Privacy Policy Legal Sitemap Contact Us RSS Feeds Newsletter Signup Subscribe to our feeds!