iEntry 10th Anniversary
RSS
Contact
 |
|
Link Buying Debate Continues 
By: Eric Enge 2006-12-21 The debate continues to rage on about link buying. Rand posted yesterday that he disagrees with Danny and Google, and Jim Boykin adds his comments early Wednesday morning. Link: Rand disagrees with Danny and Google, Jim Boykin adds his comments Clearly there is a lot of confusion over this. So here we go again in this post, I will try to put forth what I believe the Google position is. Note that I am not a Google representative, so this is simply my interpretation of what I have heard. Google wants to value a link for its editorial value. This is the essential point in all of their logic. Editorial input by third party web sites is at the heart of all ranking algorithms (I believe that this applies to the other search engines as well). There are certain types of links that do not pass editorial value:
But lets return to the essential value proposition of Googles search engine. Their goal is to offer the highest quality search results on the planet, bar none. Links offered on an editorial basis are used as a voting system to find the sites most likely to answer a question relevant to a users search query. Note that an essential part of this process is the relevance of the links to the query, and the relevance of the content on the page to the users query. That said, links carrying editorial value are at the heart of their algorithm. While the genie may be out of the bottle, dont expect Google, or any other search engine for that matter, to relent on this point. Its about the core value proposition of their search engines. Having the most relevant results can equate to increases in market share. A drop in relevance can lower their market share. Purchased links are seen as a threat to their business. A follow-on note about buying links from trusted directories, such as Yahoo, Best of the Web, and Business.com, are, in our opinion (yes, its just an opinion) treated a bit differently. These directories all have published policies where they can reject any submission, even though you have already paid them, and your money is non-refundable. In addition, they can take your listing and put it wherever they want, even if it differs from your suggested location. Thirdly, they are seen as businesses whose basic value proposition is centered around the quality of their editorial process. This results, again, in our opinion, on these cases being a scenario acceptable to the search engines for purchasing links. This is notably distinct from lower quality directories that have not earned the trust of the search engines for the quality of their editorial team (note: my list above is not meant to be a complete list of trusted directories). I dont think that the search engines will offer up any other scenarios that they consider acceptable. They are running multi-billion dollar businesses that depend on their algorithms, and purchased links just dont fit into that. Comment Tag: Link Buying Add to  Del.icio.us |  Digg |  Reddit |  Furl
Have a bookmark! -  About the Author: Eric Enge has established a reputation as a leading search engine marketing expert, and is the author of the Ramblings about SEO blog. Eric is also co-founder of Moving Traffic, Inc., the publisher of City Town Info and Custom Search Guide. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SearchNewz
is an iEntry, Inc. ® publication
©
$line) {
echo $line ;
}
?>
All Rights Reserved. Newsletter Archive - Privacy Policy - Legal - Sitemap - Contact Us - RSS Feeds - Newsletter Signup |
